The following is the outline for a presentation Elizabeth Stringer, Karen Fine, and I presented at the Charleston School of Law on January 12, 2018. Links to word drafts of the materials follow.
-
Temporary relief SCRFC 21
-
Substantive relief one is seeking at the conclusion of a case that is sought prior to trial
-
Can be brought once automatically prior to trial
-
Can be brought to seek relief that wasn’t previously sought
-
Can only be sought a second time to modify prior temporary order if there is pendent lite substantial change of circumstances Calhoun v. Calhoun, 331 S.C. 157, 501 S.E.2d 735, 739 (Ct.App. 1998)
-
Burden of proof
-
Preponderance of the evidence for initial case
-
Substantial change of circumstances for modification cases and subsequent temporary motion
-
-
-
When to seek temporary relief?
-
Is the status quo acceptable?
-
Would discovery strengthen one’s ability to obtain temporary relief
-
Automatic discovery under new SCFCR 25
-
-
Seeking procedural relief prior to temporary relief
-
Appointment of guardian ad litem to investigate prior to seeking custody modification
-
Substance abuse testing prior to seeking alimony/custody
-
-
-
The distinction between temporary relief and procedural relief SCRCP 6 and SCFCR 21
-
Temporary relief is relief sought in the pleading that is being sought prior to trial
-
Procedural relief is relief addressing the litigation process
-
Temporary relief, Rule 21, SCFCR; procedural relief Rule 6, SCRCP
-
Temporary relief, 5 business day’s notice; procedural relief 10 days notice
-
Temporary relief, serve affidavits at hearing; procedural relief, serve supporting affidavits with motion; serve defending affidavits two days prior to hearing
-
-
Drafting initial motion
-
What relief is being sought
-
What factual and legal arguments will lead the court to grant that relief
-
How will one develop the factual argument
-
Affidavits
-
Records
-
Discovery
-
Subpoenas
-
Guardian’s report
-
Financial declarations
-
-
Grounds “therefor” SCRCP 7(b)
-
Burden of proof
-
Modification versus initial case
-
-
How much time
-
15 minutes for very simply motions with eight pages of affidavits or less
-
30 minutes for more complex motions
-
Even more time if seeking testimony. Rule 21(b), SCFCR
-
-
-
Initial preparation
-
How to obtain affidavits, who to obtain affidavits from, and what should the affidavits say
-
Subpoenas
-
Begin preparation of financial declaration
-
Proof of income
-
Listing assets and debts
-
Documenting values of assets and debts
-
Preparing proposed parenting plan
-
Strategic considerations
-
Goals in custody will shape affidavits being sought
-
Statutory custody factors S.C. Code § 63-15-240(B)
-
-
-
-
Turning statements into affidavits
-
Personal knowledge?
-
Detail
-
Exhibits
-
-
Using financial experts in temporary hearing preparation
-
Defending temporary hearings
-
Return?
-
Rules don’t require it
-
Possibly needed if seeking attorney’s fees
-
Not proper vehicle to see relief that is not part of the opposing party’s motion for temporary relief
-
-
Cross-motion
-
If seeking affirmative relief not sought by opposing party’s motion, best practice is to file cross-motion
-
Permission from clerk or chief administrative judge on docketing scheduling
-
-
-
Final preparation
-
Final preparation of financial declaration
-
List other side’s assets and debts even if one cannot yet value them
-
Check for accuracy and plausibility
-
Be prepared to explain accurate but implausible information in client’s affidavit
-
Attach supporting documentation to client’s affidavit or financial declaration if you believe accuracy will be disputed
-
-
Witness affidavits
-
Are they based upon personal knowledge
-
Hearsay
-
Can always include what the other side says
-
Should try to limit repeating what one’s own client says
-
Statements of the children
-
If not offered for truth of matter asserted, not hearsay
-
Hearsay exceptions
-
-
Can be included even if not admissible
-
Can be objected to if not admissible and other party catches it
-
Can later damage that witnesses credibility if not accurate
-
-
Are they useful
-
Too opinionated
-
Too one sided
-
Remember the client and the witness may both be impeached at trial on the information contained in the affidavits that party submits at the temporary hearing
-
Rule 801(d)(2)(B), SCRE, “a statement of which the party has manifested an adoption or belief in its truth”
-
Relief may be “won” at the temporary hearing based on inaccurate affidavits but render the case basically untryable by the victor
-
-
Client’s affidavit
-
Should be revised repeatedly as one learns more
-
Should harmonize with other witness affidavits being presented
-
Show, don’t tell, whenever possible with exhibits
-
Cover disputed issues and relief sought in the motion
-
Don’t need histories unless relevant
-
Too much information is merely impeachment material for trial
-
-
Temporary hearing background information
-
-
Fee affidavit
-
Must include itemized statement of time spent. Strickland v. Strickland, 297 S.C. 248, 376 S.E.2d 268 (1989).
-
-
Argument outline
-
-
-
[gview file=”https://www.gregoryforman.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Preparing-for-Family-Court-Temporary-Hearings.docx”]
[gview file=”https://www.gregoryforman.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/affidavit-explanation.docx”]
[gview file=”https://www.gregoryforman.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Initial-Interview.doc”]
(0) Comments